In this installment of 10 Questions for . . . , Associate Editor Kimberly Janeway interviews Nadarajah Narendran, Ph.D., director of research at the Lighting Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, in Troy, New York. Narendran
discusses the future of lighting and explains how LED lighting holds
promise for hundreds of millions of people in developing countries
worldwide.
Why is LED technology the next big thing?
They
last longer, so there’s less landfill. And the light they produce is
improving. It’s not great yet. We’re confident because there’s a lot
more research money being put into LED technology than into compact
fluorescent lightbulbs. Therefore LED technology will improve greater and faster. There’s no one perfect lightbulb in this world. It’s a matter of more pros than cons. Compact fluorescent lightbulbs are better than incandescent bulbs. But now LED lights have come in. The CFL market will be eaten up by LEDs. Not everything, but little by little.
(Our tests have shown that CFLs can lag in color rendering and run-up time.)
What else needs to be done to improve LED lighting?
For
LED lights to be transforming, we need to look at the infrastructure.
It’s a waste of “talent” if we put an LED light in an incandescent
socket. One of the LED features is you can dim up and down and change
color, from more yellow to blue. That doesn’t happen with incandescent
bulbs. The existing sockets and fixtures do not have good thermal
management. So now if we replace incandescents with LED lights, the LED
lights may not perform optimally.
When will LED lights be more widely available and come down in price?
Over
the next five years we’ll see more products in stores. Now they’re not
commonly available, so it’s hard to see that LED lights are a good
option.
Where will CFLs fit in as LEDs become more common?
LED lights and CFLs
will coexist. With LED lights, the price is going to come down. Now
they’re in the $20-to-$50 region for a consumer. Part of the reason is
the products are coming from overseas.
Have CFLs been perfected?
CFLs
are really good now, and the quality has improved. It did ramp up when
leading manufacturers made them. It’s a better product, better lasting,
with better light and less mercury, but more products are in the
market and not all are performing the same.
(Look for our new ratings-based report of CFLs in the October 2009 issue of Consumer Reports, online and on newsstands in early September.)
Incandescent
bulbs had a long run as the dominant lighting source. What precipitated
the move toward more-efficient technologies?
The energy crisis of the 1970s and climate changes forced the need for change.
(Read our interview with Ed Hammer, inventor of the CFL.)
Other than CFLs and LED lights, are there any other lighting alternatives?
There are people trying to do other lighting. Some researchers are trying to even make incandescents more efficient.
(Learn about the White House’s plan to boost the efficiency of some fluorescent and incandescent lightbulbs.)
You’re working to improve the quality of life for South Asians through lighting. How can lighting accomplish that?
We
take lighting for granted. But there are many millions of people who do
not have access to it—they use kerosene and candles and can’t do
activities after darkness. They rely on daylight and the day is short
for them. If you can provide lighting at affordable costs, you can
provide opportunities, knowledge, education, and economic growth.
How can lighting change a family’s life?
In
the U.S., lighting is a smaller portion of our home energy use compared
with air conditioners, washers, and TVs, and. In South Asia, the cost
of running lights is a significant part of budget. So if we can help
with lights that use one third or one-tenth of the energy then it will
save money.
What kind of lighting do you expect will be used in developing nations?
LED
lights are wonderful lights sources when you don’t have access to the
power grid. These lights are the answer because power requirements are
low. You’ll be buying fewer bulbs over time, so they’re more cost
effective when there’s no power grid. And LEDs are much more efficient than CFLs and don’t have mercury and disposal issues.
Essential information: Our experts debunk some of the myths that surround CFLs.












Previous








Post a comment
Comments: