Chicken safety crosses the road
May 31, 2010 8:00 AM
This is good news for consumers. Our latest tests found bacterial contamination in 66 percent of chickens from more than 100 stores. After two years under the new standards, the USDA estimates that 39,000 illnesses will be avoided each year under the new campylobacter standards, and 26,000 fewer illnesses each year under the revised salmonella standards.
The new standards are the first-ever for campylobacter—bacteria that sickens an estimated 2 million people a year in the U.S. with diarrhea, nausea and fever—and the first revision to the salmonella standards for chicken since 1996. The President’s Food Safety Working Group wants 90 percent of all poultry processors to meet the revised salmonella standard by the end of this year.
In our most recent tests of chicken, some brands fared far better than others, but campylobacter is widespread, even in brands that control salmonella. Consumers Union has long called for the USDA to set limits on both the percentage of chicken samples that can be contaminated with campylobacter and the levels of it that they can contain.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group, notes that the “USDA still lacks authority to enforce these standards by closing failing plants—an authority stripped away in 2001 by a federal court in Supreme Beef, Inc. vs. USDA.”
Our take: Although we applaud the USDA for taking this action to control bacterial contamination of poultry, we would like the agency to review its standards regularly and progressively strengthen them to further reduce the risk of foodborne illness.
—Desiree Ferenczi
The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group, notes that the “USDA still lacks authority to enforce these standards by closing failing plants—an authority stripped away in 2001 by a federal court in Supreme Beef, Inc. vs. USDA.”
Our take: Although we applaud the USDA for taking this action to control bacterial contamination of poultry, we would like the agency to review its standards regularly and progressively strengthen them to further reduce the risk of foodborne illness.
—Desiree Ferenczi












Previous









Post a comment
Comments: